Suddenly the Hobbits begin to feel sleepy. Merry and Pippin
quickly give in, leaning against some trees, but Sam and Frodo try to resist.
Frodo goes to a creek to get some water while Sam wonders why he feels so
tired. Sam hears a snap and a splash and goes toward the source. He finds a tree holding Frodo down in the
water. He pulls Frodo out, and they soon find Merry’s lower half sticking out of
a tree (The snapping sound evidentially the tree closing itself up.) After pulling
unsuccessfully, Sam proposes lighting a fire.
“’We might try to hurt or frighten
this tree to begin with,’ said Sam fiercely, ‘If it don’t let him go, I’ll have
it down, if I have to gnaw at it,’… But Frodo, without any clear idea of why he
did so, or what he hoped for, ran along the path yelling help! help! help!”
From this we might be tempted to conclude that Frodo, the
hero of the tale, falls to panic, while Sam, the humble gardener, shows great resilience
and determination in the face of this crisis.
However, the results of their actions are not as we would expect.
Sam’s plan, well intentioned as it was, fails. Once the fire is lit, Merry shouts from within
the tree to put out the fire or “’He’ll squeeze me in two, if you don’t. He
says so!’” Meanwhile, Frodo’s panicked
shouting, as useless as it seemed, precipitates the arrival of their savior.
Now, it is my opinion that Frodo’s shouting doesn’t attract this being’s
attention – he is surprised when he finally sees Frodo and Sam, but we cannot
ignore the possibility that Frodo’s cries invoked some magic. As we will see, Tom
Bombadil has immense power. And we have already seen the Old Forest’s power. Middle
Earth is more than a faraway land with great evil and great heroes. There are
also some elements that are well beyond our own world.
And this is where metaphors can become obstructive, not
enlightening. This tale we read did not
happen. We do not live in Middle Earth –
its geography is not a lesson to us. We
do not live in Middle Earth, its magic does not apply to us. It would be tempting to discuss what “Old
Forests” are in our life. Or maybe blind
panic to situations can be more effective than thoughtful reaction. That is the purpose of Holy Texts, of
course. To enlighten. But Holy Texts are not instruction
manuals. Holy Texts do not present answers
in 5-step processes. Holy Texts are
art. Holy Texts are written
interpretations of the world around us.
Some of the words have deep meanings.
Some have simple meanings. Some
have many meanings, some have one. But
some are mere flourishes of inspiration.
I do not say ‘mere’ to be dismissive. I mean it simply. There is nothing wrong with inspiration for
the sake of inspiration. And there is
nothing wrong with enjoying and celebrating the inspiration. But to place more meaning on it than intended,
that is the problem.
There are times when we see events and ascribe meaning to
them that have no right to earn meaning.
It is raining, thus I wasn’t meant to go outside. I met my spouse at a party I attended on a
whim – I was meant to go to that party.
I had a great Latin teacher and now I have a degree in Classics, so I
was meant to have such an inspirational teacher. I missed my taxi and was late getting to the
airport and so I missed getting on my flight on 9/11; there must be a purpose I
was left to do.
It is comforting to think in such ways. When our life goes well, it is nice to
believe something guided us. And when it
goes wrong, it is comforting to think that there WAS a path, we just missed
it. This is not to reject responsibility,
but it is scary to be alone. It is eases
the terror that comes with freedom. I am
free to act in whatever way I want, but something
will help me determine the best way. The
belief system is not problematic per se.
I do it, too. Even so many
atheists believe in Karma or good energy or gut intuition. There must be something, something wiser,
something to guide me.
But what does that say about human nature? We crave meaning. We search for – and find – patterns that are
not real. We find patterns that are not
there! We would rather lie to ourselves
than admit ignorance. How else do so
many books on dating exist? It is not so
simple: If so-and-so does this they like
you. Some say that action is a positive
indicator, some say a negative one. Who
is willing to say it is not a reliable indicator of anything? Further, who would accept that answer??
We want answers, even if they are false.
But the Old Forest isn’t representative of anything. It is a flourish of inspiration. A chance for the Creative Wizard (Tolkien) to
show off a new and unparalleled world, where trees threaten to crush people if
they are burnt down. A world where trees
attack civilization. THOSE things are
ripe with metaphor. We can dig deep into
either of those sentences. But the Old
Forest, itself, has little meaning. And it
would be a mistake to believe otherwise. Every brushstroke has a purpose, but not every brushstroke has a meaning.
We must not, in the absence of Truth, accept mere ‘answers.’
It is good to know. It is wisdom to accept what is not known.
(Note: I don't think I was fated to have the late, great Dr. Fiveash. But, oh, I am glad I did.)
No comments:
Post a Comment